On Wednesday, July 16, 2008, at 09:44AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Send Fink-beginners mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Fink-beginners digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Newby Questions: Aqua/nox, updates,      and direct install
>      (Marshall Feldman)
>   2. update-all fails with gimp (Fredrik Lundgren)
>   3. Fwd: gnome update in the stable tree (Daniel Macks)
>   4. Re: update-all fails with gimp (Daniel E. Macks)
>   5. gnome update in the stable tree (David R. Morrison)
>   6. Remove dependencies not longer needed (Florian Lindner)
>   7. Re: Remove dependencies not longer needed (Alexander Hansen)
>   8. Re: if you use fink to install gnucash (David T.)
>   9. Re: if you use fink to install gnucash (Alexander K. Hansen)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:38:08 +0000 (UTC)
>From: Marshall Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Fink-beginners] Newby Questions: Aqua/nox, updates,  and
>       direct install
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm new to Fink and have three Newby questions:
>
>1. Initially, I'm trying to use Fink to install Unison. When I search for
>"Unison" in FinkCommander, two items come up. They are very similar, but one is
>called "unison-aqua" and the other, "unison-nox." I then looked at other 
>entries
>in FinkCommander, and found others with "nox" or "aqua" in their names. I've
>searched and searched but can find no documentation on the difference between
>"aqua" and "nox." What's the difference? Even better, where can I find
>documentation on this subject?
>
>2. The version of Unison available with Fink is 2.13.16, but the Unison web 
>site
>has version 2.27.57 in source code and a link to a site with version 2.27.72
>already compiled for OS X Leopard. (Why the source should lag the binary rather
>than the other way around escapes me.) This raises the question, what's the
>typical lag between the release of a new version of a software and its
>availability through Fink? I realize there must be some variability here, but 
>if
>Fink is updated say every 18 months, it may be worthwhile to bypass Fink. On 
>the
>other hand, if he delay is only, say, a week, then it's probably worthwhile to
>wait for Fink to catch up.
>
>3. This brings up a third question. Supposed that I decide to download and
>install version 2.27.72 directly from the Unison web site and bypass Fink. What
>issues do I have to be careful about if I have an earlier version installed 
>with
>Fink? What if I do not have a version installed with Fink but may want to use
>Fink in the future?
>
>Thanks for your help
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:19:29 +0200
>From: Fredrik Lundgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails with gimp
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Hello,
>When I run fink update-all I have problems with Gimp
>
>libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la'
>make[3]: *** [svg] Error 1
>make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>make: *** [all] Error 2
>### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.34pTc0 failed, exit code 2
>Removing runtime build-lock...
>Removing build-lock package...
>/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gimp2-2.0.6-1007
>(L?ser databasen ... 94166 filer och kataloger installerade.)
>Tar bort fink-buildlock-gimp2-2.0.6-1007 ...
>Failed: phase compiling: gimp2-2.0.6-1007 failed
>
>In what package can i find "libpangoft2-1.0.la"?
>
>Best wishes Fredrik
>
>########################
>
>Fredrik Lundgren
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Obs! Ny adress och mail
>
>Engelbrektsgatan 31
>582 21 Link?ping
>013 - 47 30 117
>0706 - 86 39 29
>
>Sommarhus: Ljungn?s 158
>380 30 Rockneby
>0480 - 650 98
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:41:35 -0400
>From: Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Fink-beginners] Fwd: gnome update in the stable tree
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [email protected],
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Forwarded message from "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>Last night, the massive gnome update which has been in process for  
>>many months was merged into fink's unstable tree.  This is well  
>>tested, and updates by users appear to be going fairly smoothly.
>>
>>Today, we will merge the gnome update into the stable tree.  Because  
>>we have been unable to test the dependencies of these new packages  
>>in the stable tree in advance, users can expect the "stable" tree to  
>>be "not so stable" during the next few weeks, while the bugs get  
>>worked out.
>>
>>If you are eager to start using this massive gnome update  
>>immediately, we suggest that you switch to the unstable tree.  If  
>>not, we suggest that you hold off running "fink selfupdate" for a  
>>while (perhaps a week or two) until things have again stabilized.
>>
>>Watch this list for progress reports.
>>
>>-- Dave
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
>From: "Daniel E. Macks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails with gimp
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>Fredrik Lundgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Hello,
>> When I run fink update-all I have problems with Gimp
>>
>> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la'
>> make[3]: *** [svg] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>> ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.34pTc0 failed, exit code 2
>> Removing runtime build-lock...
>> Removing build-lock package...
>> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gimp2-2.0.6-1007
>> (L?ser databasen ... 94166 filer och kataloger installerade.)
>> Tar bort fink-buildlock-gimp2-2.0.6-1007 ...
>> Failed: phase compiling: gimp2-2.0.6-1007 failed
>>
>> In what package can i find "libpangoft2-1.0.la"?
>
>I think gimp2 is not yet fixed for the new gnome library update from
>yesterday...maintainer knows and is working on it.
>
>dan
>
>-- 
>Daniel Macks
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:41:32 -0700
>From: "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Fink-beginners] gnome update in the stable tree
>To: fink-devel fink-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       Fink-Users Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
>Last night, the massive gnome update which has been in process for  
>many months was merged into fink's unstable tree.  This is well  
>tested, and updates by users appear to be going fairly smoothly.
>
>Today, we will merge the gnome update into the stable tree.  Because  
>we have been unable to test the dependencies of these new packages in  
>the stable tree in advance, users can expect the "stable" tree to be  
>"not so stable" during the next few weeks, while the bugs get worked  
>out.
>
>If you are eager to start using this massive gnome update immediately,  
>we suggest that you switch to the unstable tree.  If not, we suggest  
>that you hold off running "fink selfupdate" for a while (perhaps a  
>week or two) until things have again stabilized.
>
>Watch this list for progress reports.
>
>  -- Dave
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:10:07 +0200
>From: Florian Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Fink-beginners] Remove dependencies not longer needed
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
>Hello,
>
>is there any way to cleanup (=remove) packages that have been  
>installed as a dependency of some other package and are not need  
>anymore (e.g. the other package has been removed or the dependency has  
>changed)?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Florian
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:22:19 -0400
>From: Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] Remove dependencies not longer needed
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>On Wednesday 16 July 2008 09:10:07 Florian Lindner wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> is there any way to cleanup (=remove) packages that have been
>> installed as a dependency of some other package and are not need
>> anymore (e.g. the other package has been removed or the dependency has
>> changed)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Florian
>>
>> -
>
>The debfoster package might be what you want.  You can use it to look for 
>packages that nothing depends on, mark them for removal, and then remove 
>them.  Of course, very often nothing depends on a package with programs that 
>a user would run directly, so some care is needed.  
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: not available
>Type: application/pgp-signature
>Size: 189 bytes
>Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "David T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] if you use fink to install gnucash
>To: GNUCash Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,    David
>       Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>As one of those eager types, I have jumped in to try this update. Here's where 
>I stand so far (note that I continue to cycle through the selfupdate|update 
>process in the hopes that the various dependencies will ultimately get loaded 
>and the update will complete):
>
>1) I am asked to identify several virtual dependencies: ghostscript, octave, 
>gnuplot. I didn't have this in the most recent fink update. Accepting the 
>defaults and proceeding with installation has gotten me down from 282 packages 
>to 85, but...
>
>2) There seems to be a problem with ghostscript. One time through the cycle, 
>fink craps out with an inconsistent dependencies error, and tells me to "fink 
>scanpackages|sudo apt-get update|sudo apt-get install ghostscript=8.61-5". 
>When I do this, fink changes the virtual dependency questions. I embed them 
>here:
>
>-----------------------------------
>fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>candidates:
>
>(1)     tetex-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>(2)     ptex-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>(3)     ptex-nox-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>(4)     tetex-nox-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>
>Pick one: [3] 
>
>fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>candidates:
>
>(1)     ghostscript-nox: Interpreter for PostScript and PDF
>(2)     ghostscript6-nox: Intrp. for PostScript/PDF, v6.01, no X11 support
>
>Pick one: [1] 
>
>fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>candidates:
>
>(1)     tetex-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>(2)     tetex-nox-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>(3)     ptex-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>(4)     ptex-nox-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>
>Pick one: [4] 
>
>fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>candidates:
>
>(1)     octave-atlas: Matlab-like language for computations
>(2)     octave: Matlab-like language for computations
>
>Pick one: [1] 
>
>fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>candidates:
>
>(1)     gnuplot: Command-driven interactive plotting program
>(2)     gnuplot-nox: Command-driven interactive plotting program
>
>Pick one: [1] 
>-------------------------
>
>I'll note that ptex/tetex comes up twice, and ghostscript-nox comes up (even 
>though I just installed ghostscript=8.61-5). During the install, it looks like 
>ghostscript gets uninstalled in favor of ghostscript-nox, and then fink craps 
>out with a circular dependencies error.
>
>Cheers,
>David
>
>--- On Mon, 7/14/08, David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: if you use fink to install gnucash
>> To: "GNUCash Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Monday, July 14, 2008, 9:17 PM
>> The Great Gnome Update in fink has occurred. Taking pieces
>> of Gnome  
>> from as old as 2.12 up to mostly 2.20, there're lots of
>> upgraded apps.
>> 
>> The biggest changes for fink users of gnucash (via the fink
>> package  
>> named gnucash2) is that now printing will work much better
>> and you can  
>> edit account names without crashing gnucash.
>> 
>> One potential sticking point is that if you have custom
>> defined check  
>> formats, you will have to create them again. Gnomeprint
>> (the old) had  
>> its page origin (0,0) at the lower left of the page.
>> GtkPrint (the  
>> new) has its origin at the upper left of the page.
>> 
>> This major update affects any fink user who has OS X 10.4
>> or 10.5 on  
>> their machine.
>> 
>> Since the change happened tonight, you may want to wait a
>> day for the  
>> dust to settle. I have been using gnucash built against the
>> new gnome  
>> dependencies for  many weeks. I don't expect problems
>> as long as the  
>> fink mirrors keep things straight, and fink itself
>> doesn't try to  
>> build the new versions out of order.
>> 
>> If things work as planned, issuing the following commands
>> in a  
>> terminal window should get you gnucash built against the
>> new gnome  
>> packages:
>> fink selfupdate
>> fink update gnucash2
>> 
>> Be prepared for the update step to take a long time-- maybe
>> as long as  
>> the first time you built gnucash2. Fink will probably ask
>> you if it is  
>> OK to upgrade another 100 packages along with gnucash2 (say
>> yes!)  
>> Gnucash will still be version 2.2.5. (You could also do
>> 'fink update- 
>> all' instead of 'fink update gnucash2'. It
>> shouldn't matter for  
>> gnucash. If you use other fink programs update-all might be
>> a better  
>> route.)
>> 
>> While not necessary, I upgraded the versions of guile and
>> slib used by  
>> gnucash to 1.8 and 3b1 in the new gnucash2 packaging. It
>> will take a  
>> few more minutes to do the update, but these are current
>> versions  
>> instead of nearly ancient ones.
>> 
>> Dave
>> --
>> David Reiser
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
>
>      
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:44:26 -0400
>From: "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] if you use fink to install gnucash
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [email protected], David Reiser
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>ptex-nox-base is set up only to use ghostscript-nox.  Try ptex-base instead.
>
>David T. wrote:
>> As one of those eager types, I have jumped in to try this update. Here's 
>> where I stand so far (note that I continue to cycle through the 
>> selfupdate|update process in the hopes that the various dependencies will 
>> ultimately get loaded and the update will complete):
>>
>> 1) I am asked to identify several virtual dependencies: ghostscript, octave, 
>> gnuplot. I didn't have this in the most recent fink update. Accepting the 
>> defaults and proceeding with installation has gotten me down from 282 
>> packages to 85, but...
>>
>> 2) There seems to be a problem with ghostscript. One time through the cycle, 
>> fink craps out with an inconsistent dependencies error, and tells me to 
>> "fink scanpackages|sudo apt-get update|sudo apt-get install 
>> ghostscript=8.61-5". When I do this, fink changes the virtual dependency 
>> questions. I embed them here:
>>
>> -----------------------------------
>> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>> candidates:
>>
>> (1)     tetex-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>> (2)     ptex-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>> (3)     ptex-nox-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>> (4)     tetex-nox-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>>
>> Pick one: [3] 
>>
>> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>> candidates:
>>
>> (1)     ghostscript-nox: Interpreter for PostScript and PDF
>> (2)     ghostscript6-nox: Intrp. for PostScript/PDF, v6.01, no X11 support
>>
>> Pick one: [1] 
>>
>> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>> candidates:
>>
>> (1)     tetex-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>> (2)     tetex-nox-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
>> (3)     ptex-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>> (4)     ptex-nox-base: ASCII publishing TeX
>>
>> Pick one: [4] 
>>
>> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>> candidates:
>>
>> (1)     octave-atlas: Matlab-like language for computations
>> (2)     octave: Matlab-like language for computations
>>
>> Pick one: [1] 
>>
>> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The 
>> candidates:
>>
>> (1)     gnuplot: Command-driven interactive plotting program
>> (2)     gnuplot-nox: Command-driven interactive plotting program
>>
>> Pick one: [1] 
>> -------------------------
>>
>> I'll note that ptex/tetex comes up twice, and ghostscript-nox comes up (even 
>> though I just installed ghostscript=8.61-5). During the install, it looks 
>> like ghostscript gets uninstalled in favor of ghostscript-nox, and then fink 
>> craps out with a circular dependencies error.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>>   
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Fink-beginners mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
>
>End of Fink-beginners Digest, Vol 27, Issue 8
>*********************************************
>
>


So.....basically everything.  :)  haha!

Man.  This sure can get to be an expensive hobby, trying to catch what you can 
when it's available!  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners

Reply via email to