On 31/10/2009, at 13:28, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > I think I have found the answer: > > 12.4.1.6 Restrictions on dummy arguments not present > > ... > (7) If it is a pointer, it shall not be allocated, deallocated, > nullified, pointer-assigned, or supplied > as an actual argument corresponding to an optional nonpointer dummy > argument. > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > so > > call sub2(a) ! <<< VALID or NOT? > > is invalid for > > subroutine sub2(b) > integer, optional :: b > end subroutine > > but valid for > > subroutine sub2(b) > integer, pointer, optional :: b > end subroutine > > which is working with/without the patch. > > Altough the burden is once again on the user, this could be detected > for contained procs and with -fwhole-file (is it worth opening a PR > for that?). > > Dominique Hello, Dominique. Replying to the digest message without providing context makes it hard to understand what you're referring to! ;-)
Cheers, -- monipol http://finkers.wordpress.com Submitting a Fink bug report? Read this: http://www.finkproject.org/doc/netiquette/index.php http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/bug-reports/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
