On 8/22/11 11:45 AM, "Alexander Hansen" <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> However, I'm more curious which packages wouldn't let you use
>>> ghostscript rather than ghostscript-nox, since the latter just
>>> has less functionality.
>> 
>> I didn't use ghostscript because I had to, I just didn't know that
>> it would get in the way of ghostscript-nox, so I not knowing I
>> would need ghostscript-nox later on, I chose it arbitrarily.
>> 
> 
> Which still doesn't answer the question "what package wants
> ghostscript-nox but not ghostscript?"  That just seems odd.  Anyway,
> that data is available.

Oh, I misunderstood the question. That's easy, there were only two that I
tried that weren't satisfied with ghostscript, "Dia" and "Etherape". Thanks.

Laine



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model 
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and 
the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free 
download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
Fink-beginners@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

Reply via email to