> On Sep 26, 2016, at 04:44, Daniel Johnson <daniel.johnso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> There is a new OpenSSL libversion out, 1.1.0. I’ve made a new package but 
> want to check with everyone else where I should put it, base or crypto. It 
> does have a new BuildDepends, text-template-pm, so that would have to move to 
> base too. Also note that not everything will be able to use it right away. 
> There have been a lot of changes to the API (removed functions, structs made 
> opaque, new threading model) so other packages usually need changes to work 
> with it. Opinions?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 

I’d be OK with leaving the legacy openssl in base/ to satisfy cvs and putting 
the new one back in crypto/ , but I haven’t really thought any deeper about the 
ramifications.

—akh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
fink-core@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core

Reply via email to