On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 11:28 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Achieving that is a quite involved task indeed, since it means you have > to keep parts of a package around (like libtiff.3.dylib), enve though > the rest of the package is removed, creating "orphaned" files that > nobody owns anymore, and that hence will start to heap up. >
I may be wrong, but it seems like it would be better to keep the removal behavior the same, but if someone tries to remove a package whose shared libs are being used by other installed packages, we could prompt with something like "Package foo provides foolib, which is currently used by baz-1, are you sure you want to continue?". Would that make sense? -Ken _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
