At 22:59 Uhr +0100 02.02.2002, Max Horn wrote: >>Here is my question, though. Do you know why the library got listed as >>libz.1.dylib before, but now it is getting listed at libz.1.1.3.dylib? >>It seems to me that it is more robust, for possible future upgrades, >>if the otool listing gives libfoo.N.dylib (which is of course a symlink >>to libfoo.N.x.y.dylib). > >I agree. The reason for this is that Apple symlinked >/usr/lib/libz.dylib to libz.1.1.3.dylib rather than to libz.1.dylib. >I don't like this, but that's how they did it.
I have to correct myself: the actual cause is that we use a different install_name at link time, i.e. we give libz.1.dylib as install_name, and Apple obviously libz.1.1.3.dylib. Cheers, Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
