ahh this helps, but why did we do this? -dev is more logical then -bin
which really should be the base pkg IMHO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Also, there is no pkg-dev. That is a Debian project thing, and we are
>using different names.
>
> Fink name Debian name
> pkg pkg-dev
> pkg-shlibs pkg
> pkg-bin pkg-runtime
>
>We use pkg instead of pkg-dev for a better upgrade path, since lots of
>packages are already installed.
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
Justin F. Hallett
CAISnet Inc.
2nd Floor, 11635 - 160 Street
Edmonton, AB, Canada T5M 3Z3
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.caisnet.com/
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
