At 18:40 Uhr -0500 14.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >There is another aspect of this which has not yet been mentioned. > >When fink is analyzing dependencies, it (apparently, since I can't read >perl) creates a list of existing .info files which it can suggest it >will build in order to meet unmet dependencies. These will have to be >generated in some new way, which adds all the splitoffs to the list >as well sas the original.
Actually, I did mention it (though indirectly I admit): At 0:19 Uhr +0100 15.02.2002, Max Horn wrote: >For splitoffs (and also for variants), we simply created additional >hash entries, each represneting the splitoff/variant package. What is meant here is exactly what you ask for above - we create entries in the package list for each splitoff package. This means it will list them on "fink list", and "fink info" will work, too. >Still thinking this through, will have more comments later. Sure thing. Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
