I thought that it was against policy to have stuff in /sw/include with the same name as stuff in /usr/include. :)
Does this package check for db_185.h? This isn't in /usr/include and could be symlinked in the db package. Does subversion require db3/4 or would it be happy with db in libSystem? (just curious). Peter On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 06:51 AM, Max Horn wrote: > I wonder, would it make sense for those two packages to put a > symlink from /sw/include/db?/db.h to /sw/include/db.h ? > > Compiling subversion required that, otherwise it used the db.h > from /usr/include, which isn't nice. I know I could have fixed > this by forcing it to use -I/sw/include/db4 in its CPPFLAGS, > but I wonder if other packages could be affected by similiar > problems? > _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
