On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 01:46 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 08:28 , Ben Hines wrote: >> At 7:18 PM -0500 2/21/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >>> We've got some good ports, think one of the maintainers (or even the >>> whole Fink project) could win something? >> >> Is Fink really an "Open Source Port"? :) > > No, but we are an Open Source Port-er, besides: > Best Mac OS X Technology Adoption is another possible category, > depending on how thats classified Best Mac OS X Open Source Port: Ease Of Use: 20% Adherence to Aqua Human Interface Guidelines: 20% Use of Mac OS X Technologies: 20% Innovation: 10% Use of Open Source Technology:30% We might get full marks on the last one, but we don't adhere to the HIG at all (mostly xwindows apps), Fink isn't that easy to use, we use about zero OS X technologies... :-) Best Mac OS X Technology Adoption is even less likely. See http://designawards.apple.com/ for the criteria (they're near the bottom). -- Finlay _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
