At 12:25 Uhr -0500 13.03.2002, Dan Winship wrote:
>>That's not completly true. Some files are installed by both, like 
>>glib-config, etc..
>
>No, glib 2.0 uses pkgconfig.
>
>If there are any files that both try to install, it's a bug and 
>should be reported to bugzilla.gnome.org. You're supposed to be able 
>to have both glib 1.2.10 and glib 2.0 installed into the same prefix 
>without any problems (and ditto for gtk and the upcoming gnome2 
>stuff).

You are right, I take back what I said. I somehow thought glib-config 
was installed, but that's not true.


>>If you are talking about the symlink from /sw/include/gtk to 
>>/sw/include/gtk-1.2 - yeah, that may have to go, but that's not 
>>affecting glib. In fact I am running with glib-1.2 and glib-2.0 
>>next to each other in /sw for quite some time now, I just never 
>>packaged it up.
>
>The problem comes when you try to build something that uses glib-2.0 
>(or gtk-2.0 or whatever). glib-1.2.10-3.info does:
>       (cd %i/include && ln -s glib-1.2/* .)
>so something that wants to be including glib 2.0's glib.h could end 
>up with glib-1.2's instead if /sw/include is in the CPPFLAGS (which 
>it always is, right?)

It's in there by default. But if done properly, it's in there at the 
end, so no problem arises.



Max
-- 
-----------------------------------------------
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to