At 12:25 Uhr -0500 13.03.2002, Dan Winship wrote: >>That's not completly true. Some files are installed by both, like >>glib-config, etc.. > >No, glib 2.0 uses pkgconfig. > >If there are any files that both try to install, it's a bug and >should be reported to bugzilla.gnome.org. You're supposed to be able >to have both glib 1.2.10 and glib 2.0 installed into the same prefix >without any problems (and ditto for gtk and the upcoming gnome2 >stuff).
You are right, I take back what I said. I somehow thought glib-config was installed, but that's not true. >>If you are talking about the symlink from /sw/include/gtk to >>/sw/include/gtk-1.2 - yeah, that may have to go, but that's not >>affecting glib. In fact I am running with glib-1.2 and glib-2.0 >>next to each other in /sw for quite some time now, I just never >>packaged it up. > >The problem comes when you try to build something that uses glib-2.0 >(or gtk-2.0 or whatever). glib-1.2.10-3.info does: > (cd %i/include && ln -s glib-1.2/* .) >so something that wants to be including glib 2.0's glib.h could end >up with glib-1.2's instead if /sw/include is in the CPPFLAGS (which >it always is, right?) It's in there by default. But if done properly, it's in there at the end, so no problem arises. Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
