On 20/3/02 4:24 PM, "Jeremy Higgs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/3/02 4:18 PM, "Rich Ramos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> Sorry if this wasn't particularly clear. If you haven't already, it may be >>> an idea to read the Documentation and FAQ, and if you have already, maybe >>> this sort of information should be included in it! :) >> >> Trust me, I have read every word of the FAQ and the Documentation. >> >> This whole using-the-cvs-thing has lead to a lot of confusion (I'm sure it's >> been lost in the thread by now, but I NEVER wanted to use cvs). >> >> Anyway, I'll have to sleep on this at this point and I'l will try to put >> together a better response tomorrow. >> >> Thanks for the clarification. >> >> -Rich >> > > OK... When I get a chance, I'll have a look at the FAQ and docs just to > check if it needs clearing up in regards to binary/stable/unstable and > CVS... If that's the case, maybe we (developers) need to fix it up a bit and > give Finlay a hand (share the workload, basically :) ). > > Updating to CVS shouldn't really affect your packages if you're using the > binary distribution, as nothing on the servers has changed. If you're > content with just staying with the binary distro, then you should be OK. > Bugger. Wrong mailing list (should've been fink-users). Sorry guys! _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
