At 14:03 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >Hi. There was a discussion on #fink a week or so ago about what package >names to use when the shared libraries are incidental rather than a central >function of the package in question. The suggestion being discussed was >that there could be two naming conventions: > > foo, foo-shlibs, and foo-bin when the libraries are the main point > foo-headers, foo-shlibs, and foo when the binaries are the main point > (and the libraries are incidental) > >I have made an example package for the second kind: a splitoff package >for mysql which I have just put into the splitoffs directory in the >shared-libraries module. Any comments about my packaging of this example, >or about naming conventions in general, would be most welcome.
I don't like "-headers", why don't we go for "-dev" ? Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
