At 13:30 Uhr -0400 17.04.2002, Chris Devers wrote: >On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote: > >> At 10:22 Uhr -0400 17.04.2002, Chris Devers wrote: >> >On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote: >> > >> >> the following packages have a "Restrictive" license: >> > >> >What is the working definition of restrictive? Non-GPL? Non-Berkeley? >> >(Arguably, GPL is much more restrictive than BSD, but somehow I don't >> >think that's a problem in this context). >> >> That is completly irrelevant. > >It's relevant because I wasn't sure what 'restrictive' means here. I >wasn't trying to be combative or anything -- I know you're busy and I'm >not trying to create more work for you.
Well yeah - what I meant is "it's irrelevant to determine whether a package is fit for the bindist or not", sorry, re-reading what I wrote I should have made this more clear in the original mail! Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
