Max Horn wrote: > Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, > if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which > already depended on that, you could just drop the audiofile > dependency. But if now FOO is converted to BuildDepend on audiofile, > and depend on audiofile-shlibs - you know have a problem! Ugh. > > This caught us in at least one case... We have to be careful... >
All the more reason to get this conversion done as soon as we can, IMHO. Otherwise we will have more and more packages which accidentally rely on the old methods. Maybe we should ask all developers to do the following: Go through your packages (particularly the ones in the stable tree), and use "otool -L" to examine all of the binaries and libraries. Be sure to explicitly list dependencies or BuildDependencies on all of the packages which provide the libraries indicated there. Or is there a way we could partially automate this? -- Dave _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
