On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 08:47 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> OK, still replying to myself. I think I understand this now, but I would > say this whole business is not a brilliant demonstration of the > usefulness of the shlibs-splitoff story. In this special case, it was > less than useful. Yeah. The mistake was in not making a separate package (qt3) right away when the version changed. The only true fix is to have *nothing* provide qt-shlibs or qt or any such thing, and then update all packages to depend on either qt2/qt2-shlibs or qt3/qt3-shlibs. I've got a proper splitoff package for qt2 and I'm testing interaction between it and qt3 right now (gotta rebuild qt3, so it'll be a bit). I'll have something in unstable in a couple of hours. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
