Ben Hines [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > At 3:18 AM +0200 6/9/02, Max Horn wrote: > >Replaces works just fine, you just misunderstood what it does. If > >Pkg A "Replace: B", that s does *not* mean that the pkg A is a > >successor of pkg B. it merely means that A and B have some files in > >common. Normally you would get problems when switching between > >packages that share such files, but the replaces fields eases this > >transition. > > > >So, Fink and dpkg are behaving correctly. > > > >For further information, consult the dpkg docs. > > Ookay.. so, it is intended that the upgrade is impossible without > force-removing system-libgl?
No, it is not. I was under the impression a Conflicts:/Replaces: should automatically force removal of the old package... Max, how do we make it get replaced properly, then? Are we going to have to end up with a Provides: system-libgl to make it replace nicely? -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://ranger.befunk.com/ Is it considered bad form to quote one's self in a .sig? -- Me _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
