I don't want to reopen a general debate about the necessity of the
crypto tree, but it seems to me that there are a couple of packages in
there that don't need to be.
One case is ircii. I cannot see any reason why this is in crypto. Since
I am maintaining it now, I took the liberty to move the new version out
of crypto.
Other examples are maxima and yafc. Why are they in crypto?
My interest in this question comes from the fact that on this machine
here I don't want to install fink's openssl. And since the latest change
in python22, I cannot do fink update-all any more without having to
install openssl, unless I desactivate the crypto tree completely. The
problem is that the highest version of the python package is now no
longer supplied by python-2.2.1-8, but by the "python" splitoff of
python22-2.2.2-1, and the latter depends on openssl and lives in crypto.
--
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
- Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree Martin Costabel
- Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree Ben Hines
- Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree David R. Morrison
