-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
On Freitag, Dezember 6, 2002, at 10:21 Uhr, Ben Hines wrote:
I can only second this. If we followed strict and recommended naming schemes this would be a checkup release and they do not constitute a change in the lesser indicator of the packaging system.On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 06:58 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The actual 0.5.0 distribution is going to be a slight modification of the
one which is already there, including fink-0.11.1-1 and apt-0.5.4-7. The
question is, should I just call it 0.5.0 even though it's changed, or
should I change the number to 0.5.0a or even 0.5.1?
I say make it 0.5.0a
- -d
- - "Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,
- - Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream to dream before.." Edgar Allen Poe - The Raven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE98VJ0iW/Ta/pxHPQRA+qeAJ4jVgdnlKtYoGZOipYlv6KXjHDuegCfQIuH
BImOQ6eCpveCb5gzP5wSOac=
=sxR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
