Sounds like a bad idea. A very bad idea. This just adds another line to the FAQ, and any FAQ entry is something that will be asked over and over on the mailing list.
But that's just my two cents. On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > I just checked in a patch to Fink CVS which reworks the package > indexing code. Previously, if we detected the db was out-of-date, we > ignored the current one and rebuilt it from scratch. Now I made it so > that if it detects a modified or new package, it injects the > description for just the files that are modified. > > However, there is no reliable way of pruning old package info. So, if > you remove a package's info file, but don't re-index, the old info is > still in the database and available to Fink, and so on. Can anybody see > any problem with this? > > -- Finlay > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte > are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE > Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > _______________________________________________ > Fink-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSEE (6/86) + BSChem (3/95) + BAEnglish (8/95) + $2.50 = mocha latte ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
