In a discussion on #fink today, we arrived at the following plan. A non-opensource license would either be labeled
License: Restrictive (as done currently), or License: Restrictive/Distributable The second one would be used when it is OK for Fink to distribute a binary, even though the license has some restrictions. Comments? -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
