At 18:10 Uhr -0800 26.01.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
Does anyone object to including FinkCommander on the next Fink .dmg? It is pretty mature these days.Sounds OK I guess.
I am thinking it would be separate from the .pkg, perhaps in a "FinkCommander" folder with its own readme files and such.
BTW maybe we should create a release "checklist". For every release, almost always something goes wrong; let's collect some of these things and write them down, to be checked specifically :-).
Also, last releases was not immediately announced on fink-announce. And it was never announce via a SF.net news item (which would have gotten us onto the SF.net front page again and into their news RSS feed). So we should have a list of sites that will be notified, and the "release manager" (the person mainly responsible for the release) should either update these or have somebody doing it (e.g. dmalloc did most of the news announcements last time I think, so it probably would make sense if he sends the announcement to fink-announce and posts a SF.net news item).
However, to avoid confusion, I'd appreciate if before announcements are posted everywhere we first conduct a minimal test set etc., and talk back session here.
Cheers,
Max
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
