On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 05:01 PM, Carsten wrote:
Hi Max,
Yes I am seeing the same thing too.
Agreed, fink should use the existing (dirty) index in this case. It does seem to do so when a package is specified ("fink list zip" or "fink apropos zip" for example).
I believe I have seen this problem even before my last patch, but it certainly is occurring more frequently now. I'm not sure what is happening but I will have another look at my code submission to see what is going on.
But I wonder where this number "291" packages is coming from (240 on my system). Is this the number of debs/binary programs?
dunno, but a fink index does indeed make all better...
-chris zubrzycki - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt ID: 0xA2ABC070 Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3 1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070 ======================================================== I think you've been smoking Cocoa instead of coding with it.... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
