Hi, Last monday I sent a msg to the maintainer of doxygen, saying that to build correctly with the new tetex, it was sufficient to add :
PatchScript: << mv doc/doxygen_manual.tex tmp sed 's\setlength\renewcommand\g' < tmp > doc/doxygen_manual.tex << and that this was because doxygen_manual.tex relied on an obsolete (since 96 !!!) version of fancyhdr.sty _ as is well explained in fancyhdr.sty itself. I was away for the rest of the week, and when returning I see a large amount of mail on the lists concerning the subject _ apparently my msg never reached the maintainer _ and that instead of this little patch, fink effectively downgrades our version of fancyhdr.sty to that of 95 ! In addition, shouldn't the 'Depends' on fancydr not have been a BuildDepends ? This is just to build the documentation.... Or do I miss something ? But I would think it is much better to patch this package rather than to downgrade other, important, latex packages _ and this to an 8 year's old version... Jean-Francois Mertens ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
