this is why we have the flag IMHO, else we'd make the buildonlydepends flag in fink, all -dev pkgs = buildonly depend :) we figured there would be rare cases where this wouldn't be so and left the feild to the maintainer's disgrestion :) That is my stand on it.
"David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >The main executable won't start up unless the headers for the libs are >present. So it seems like the binaries and headers should be packaged >together. On the other hand, other things may depend on this, so the >BuildDependsOnly=True flag does not seem appropriate. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett <Marketing> -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. <Arctic Spas> -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
