Am Mittwoch, 12.03.03 um 00:48 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
When the problems with indexing showed up in fink-0.12.0, I think we agreedYes I have already verified that this "fix" was actually not necessary. Bootstrapping and various other things work fine w/o it and I have been running w/o it all the time since the day after 0.12.0 was released - no problems so far.
that 0.12.0 shouldn't be the basis of a binary distro.
I was worried that removing the (un-logged) fix for a previous indexing problem might somehow break bootstrapping. But I've just tested the bootstrap with CVS head, and it bootstraps just fine.
So, would this be a good time to release 0.12.1? I'd like to get it released, and then in a week or so moved to stable, so that I could work on the next binary distro.
OK, go ahead. If you prefer I can also do it tomorrow, but right now I am planning to finally get some sleep after a long busy day :-)
(We'll also need to get KDE moved to stable before the bindist, in order to solve the last piece of the libpng mess, but I expect that will happen pretty soon as well.)
Well we all know the problems with that... (missing deps etc.)
In the meantime I really would love to have evolution in the bindist, I think quite some people are using evolution, I get tons of positive feedback on it, etc. But there are multiple packages it depends on which are not yet in stable. Maybe we can get some of those moved. I can try to compile a list of what is missing tomorrow.
Max
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
