We keep getting requests / bug reports due to problems caused by
packages missing from the bindist (ghostscript). There is no really
useful error message printed in these cases by apt-get / FinkCommander
etc. right now...
So I think it would be good to at least have a FAQ entry that explains
the reasons for this (legal issues), and how to work around it
(installing the missing package(s) from source).
Also, maybe at least FinkCommander could be improved to mention this
possibility when installing a package from the bindist fails?
Cheers,
Max
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist Max Horn
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist Ben Hines
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist Alexander Hansen
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist Ben Hines
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindi... Alexander Hansen
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist Martin Costabel
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist Alexander Hansen
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindi... Martin Costabel
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in b... Alexander Hansen
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist David R. Morrison
- Re: [Fink-devel] FAQ: packages not in bindist David R. Morrison
