On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 05:33 PM, Matt Stephenson wrote:
On Tuesday, Apr 1, 2003, at 11:17 Australia/Sydney, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 02:16 AM, Matt Stephenson wrote:
I tend towards 'Restrictive/Distributable' because nothing is mentioned specifically in the glut license about distributing binaries, its just a general statement or maybe I'm being to picky.
Many licenses don't mention binaries.
I still don't see what is restrictive about this license. What is restricted?
So the only other license field we can use is 'OSI-Approved' which quote from our packaging manual "One of OSI's requirements is that free distribution of binaries and sources is allowed." I'm not saying the license is restrictive as such I just don't think it falls under OSI-Approved.
It doesn't say that distribution of binaries and sources is not allowed, though. It says "distribution is allowed without license".
-Ben
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
