okay what is we added required system-perl560 pkgs and such that symlink to perl560 and perl561 and perl580 Obviously with the fink pkgs or system counterparts for each version. then we could use /sw/bin/perl[560|561|580] in the apropriate places, and we would know they exist and be using a full /path/to/perl
any how this will need to be fixed before I add apache2 to unstable, well i suppose apache2 coul dbe added but not mod_perl which it likely the most used dso for apache
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 07:35 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
One thing to keep in mind here is that the new versioned perl packages
may need to *build* the package using a different version of perl than
the one that the user is currently running. Each -pm560 package has
to be built with perl 5.6.0, each -pm580 package has to be built with
perl 5.8.0, and so on. So we have to construct a system which does this.
That's what I've attempted to do.
Why not use perl5.6 and perl5.8 symlinks managed by update-alternatives, to make appear less dependant on a specific version...
-chris zubrzycki - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt ID: 0xA2ABC070 Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3 1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070 ======================================================== Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps...
chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :)
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
