I have not seen one junk mail actually in the fink list.
Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 6:20 PM -0500 6/9/03, Chris Dolan wrote:
If my vote counts, mark it down as an emphatic no. Making things more cumbersome for humans is not a good way to deal with spam. I use SpamAssassin on my mailserver and the *only* Fink spam I've ever seen is when someone on the list has hit reply-all on a spam message. Pressure on SF.net is a much better solution.
Chris
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Yo folks,
sadly we are getting more and more spam on this list. I have to wonder if we after all should make it "moderated" like fink-users, too (that essentially means that only members can post to the list; non-member will have to be approved by the list admin).
I am not exactly fond of the idea, but until SF.net puts their spam filters in place (they are working on it, but I have no clue when they will be available), that's the best thing I can do about the spam. What do people think? Can we still accept the spam level we have, or is it too much?
It's not that I am eager to do this, but I'd like to at least know what people think.
Cheers,
Max
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
