Am Mittwoch, 19.11.03 um 05:32 Uhr schrieb TheSin:
but it'll link libfoo.1.2.1.dylib so the filename has the right version, I'm not sure about the compat versions, but it should work as it'll never go backwards.I think that is a *very* bad idea what you are doing, Justin. It is quite likely to cause us pain in the future. If your only justification is "ugly filenames", then I ask you to stop doing it. It's a hack based on incomplete understanding of the issue, by what I hear from you. You are changing the filenames and the compat version info in the .dylib in a semi-arbitrary fashion. Not good.
I never heard of --version-number...I'll research it, but my little (x+y):z:y works better then -release for now, all of gnome 2.4, gnome1 and a few other libs are still using -release just as and FYI
Max
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
