Good point, bad example, adding a new epoch will definitely satisfy any incrementation requirement... (default epoch is zero, 1 is higher, the epoch 1 is a new version)
-Ben
On Nov 8, 2003, at 5:21 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Oh and one more thing:
in many cases, it is *not* sufficient to just fix the bug and move one. In many cases you will also have to increment the package revision. Because everything I reported here as a warning always was *ignored* by Fink. So if you change
Epoch : 1
to
Epoch: 1
you effectively modify the generated .deb. Which, according to our policy, means that you have to increment the revision.
Just a reminder!
Max
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
