plus if you have the old one compiled the deb is still there and it'll pick it.
but you can do
fink install libxml2-2.5.x-%r and it'll force that one. But you need the revision. and update-all will default to replace it.
--- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 9:03 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I wanted to roll back from unstable's "libxml2" at version 2.6.x, to stable's "libxml2" at version 2.5.x so that I can build Perl's XML::LibXML again (which isn't compatible with 2.6.x yet).
I thought I could just copy the stable .info file to my local/main area, and since I have local first, it would shadow the ones defined later. Apparently that's not the case.
Do I really have to blow away the unstable versions just so that it sees the stable versions? My next rsync update will then re-upgrade me. Ugh.
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
