thanks dan, now to isolate why :\ --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 16-Dec-03, at 6:12 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Using Fink/*.pm from 2003/12/10 it works correctly, 2003/12/14 it doesn't. It appears the problem occurred with your PkgVersion.pm v1.187->1.188.
dan
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:39:03PM -0700, TheSin wrote:can you install fink pre 0.17.1 and tell me if this is still the case I
think you'll find this has been a bug for some time. I just reviewed
the code and on build it calls resolve_depends(2 the 2 means to return
only builddepends and not the depends when it should call it with 1
which would return both, but that isn't something I changed. And I
don't want to force it to 1 which out knowing more of the consequences.
But it it has been happening since before my changes then I'll look
deeper into else it might be a change in resolve_depends that I made.
On 15-Dec-03, at 11:24 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Both of these should fail during the build phase (notice "dlcompa" typo, giving a -dev or -shlibs package that does not exist).
Package: foo Depends: dlcompat-shlibs BuildDepends: dlcompa-dev
Package: bar Depends: dlcompa-shlibs BuildDepends: dlcompat-dev
Using fink from CVS (HEAD, timestamp 2003/12/15 23:31:00), 'fink build
foo' fails (can't resolve dependency "dlcompa-dev") as it should. But
'fink build bar' compiles cleanly. Fink eventually complains during
'fink install bar' (this warning is from fink, not dpkg).
-- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
