When doing things like 'perl5.8.0 Makefile.PL' during the build phase of a versioned perl module, should we be using "the first perl5.8.0 in PATH" or %p/bin/perl5.8.0? The first is how 'Type: perl 5.8.0' seems to do it, but it seems like if the user has some other perl5.8.0 higher in PATH we're going to have a perl that was compiled with unknown options. The latter seems like a better guarantee of consistency.
dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
