On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:30:57PM +1100, Rohan Lloyd wrote: > On 22 Dec 2003, at 1:55 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > > >I notice a *lot* of packages have hardcoded /sw in their .patch > >files. So first, could everyone please check the things yuo maintain > >for this problem? I'm going to make 'fink validate' whine about this > >shortly...
...by which I mean "as of Validation.pm 1.82". > >To make this and other validator checks more reliable, I'm > >wondering about .patch filenames. Is there a time when having a > >*.info and *.patch where the corresponding filename roots "*" do > >not match is a good idea? > > One example I've seen is emacs21. There are 3 variants (emacs21, > emacs21-xaw3d and emacs21-nox) but they all use the same patch file. That's exactly the kind of case I wanted. Thanks. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
