Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not use the new info file name format? > > it sure helps to track changes. > > -Ben > > On Dec 24, 2003, at 12:38 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > > > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/base > > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv2951 > > > > Added Files: > > fink-0.17.3-1.info fink-mirrors-0.0.2-2.info > > Removed Files: > > fink-0.17.2-1.info fink-mirrors-0.0.2-1.info > > Log Message: > > new versions > >
Hi Ben. I agree that the new format has many advantages. However, right at the moment, we are managing at least 4 different trees (stable/unstable for both 10.2-gcc3.3/10.3), and I'm finding it to be quite difficult to keep track of which versions are where, when the version numbers are not part of the name. I'll become a bigger fan of the new format once the conversion to 10.3 is complete. -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
