not sure I wanted a Co-Maintainer field but was told to list them both, and just cause the PDB ignores it, doesn't make it wrong, maybe the docs sure be revised along with the pdb? So packages need more then one maintainer IMHO
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.

On 8-Jan-04, at 7:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:

Against the documentation. Second (and I suppose subsequent)
maintainers are ignored by the PDB. How does Fink Commander (in
particular the feedback mechanism) deal with such a case?

dan

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:49:29AM -0700, TheSin wrote:
What about co maintained pkgs?

On 8-Jan-04, at 7:09 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:

Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink

Modified Files:
        ChangeLog Validation.pm
Log Message:
Be anal about format of Maintainer (so can parsed according to its
documentation).


--
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



Reply via email to