Sorry but I don't understand. As far as I can understand I need this alternative in the case the user has tetex installed via Fink and not via Gerben's i-Installer.
Am I wrong?
IMHO yes. Since system-tetex "Provides" tetex-base, you don't need to mention it there. The dependency on tetex-base will be fulfilled by system-tetex as well. I believe that the alternative makes that system-tetex, when it is installed, will appear twice on the list of dependencies, thus giving the error you are seeing. I haven't verified this, though.
Andrea.
On 23 Feb 2004, at 14:35, Martin Costabel wrote:
Package: pyx-py23 Version: 0.5.1 Revision: 1 Depends: python23|python23-nox, tetex-base | system-tetex, ghostscript
system-tetex already "Provides" tetex-base, so you don't need this alternative. I suspect this is where the problem comes from.
Martin
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
