David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. > > If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are > *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them > from that tree.
The packages for lame and atk1 do not follow shlibs policy. They have both userland run-time programs and compile-time headers and .dylib links in %N which is BDOnly. Probably the easiest solution is to move the compile stuff into a new BDOnly %N-dev splitoff, remove BDOnly from %N, and then make any package that has any dependency on %N and/or %N-shlibs to be BuildDepends:%N-dev and Depends:%N,%N-shlibs. I think I'm pretty swamped with work until Monday but can take a look then. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
