On Mar 31, 2004, at 01:00, Martin Costabel wrote:
The gimp-app guy seems to have compiled gimp-2 using Fink, but he doesn't tell how and he doesn't let the Fink community participate in his work. For me, this intellectual honesty aspect is the main point. Commercial aspects are less important, maybe not important at all in the case of gimp-app. As the FSF can explain better, there are other drawbacks of distributing binaries without the precise sources used for producing them.

Ahh, ok, in my cursory examination of the site I missed that fact. Sorry for the confusion


Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a17 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r !y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------





------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to