Peter O'Gorman writes: > Benjamin Reed wrote: > > > Tom Emerson wrote: > > > >> Greetings, > >> > >> I see on http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/nomaintainer.php that the > >> Guile and Flex packages need a maintainer. I'm interested in doing > >> this, if no one else has taken them on. > > > > > > I can't speak for Guile, > > I can :) > > While the package for guile-1.4 is unmaintained, guile16-1.6.4 has a > maintainer.. me. I guess I should take maintainership of the older guile > package too. Hmm.
OK, looks like I'm 0-2 then. :-) I grok the reason to keep around the different flex versions. But why the older guile? -- Tom Emerson Basis Technology Corp. Software Architect http://www.basistech.com "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever" ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
