Mich�le Garoche wrote:
Does it imply indirectly too that there is a shared library portion of the package, or can I have only header in a part (made BuildDependsOnly), the reminder in other one (with the copy you mentioned if needed) and no shared libraries at all?
i.e: foo (the runtime package) foo-dev (with headers only)
or should I have: foo foo-shlibs foo-dev
You can certainly have packages with headers that don't have shared libraries; it's reasonably rare but it happens. There's no point in making an empty -shlibs in that case...
-- Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. RangerRick [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://ranger.befunk.com/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
