Dear Dave,
This proposal looks perfect to me. As to Peter's reservation, couldn't that be met with his suggestion of BuildDependsOnly: false or a variant ?
On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
(It is possible that in future versions of fink, this warning will be expanded to cover the case of a .deb with header files and a static library as well.)
I suggest to drop this (everything s possible in the future ..).
In addition to Martin's examples, there are a lot of pkgs [eg, lua, tolua..,
but there must be hundreds: why should another pkg not be able to call
their executabes, if only through a script, or through system()]
for which this would lead to headaches _ and to unnecessary splitting.
Best,
Jean-Francois
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
