Blair Zajac wrote:

Building rrdtool by hand and running make test gets this to pass just fine. Maybe rrd-pm.info should run configure and then just cd into perl-shared and perl-piped?

I was trying to avoid this, since it would take a whole lot longer to build for no reason essentially. However, the pm's appear to be broken no matter what, when built against a shared rrdtool, so it appears I'll have to do it that way anyways.


We should probably add this test into the .info file. However, testing RRDp.pm doesn't work at all. I took a look at this bug and it appears that demo2.rrd is not being generated.

In rrdinfo.info, to shrink librrd.dylib by 50%, can we use the --enable-local-libpng and --enable-local-zlib configure options? This will prevent RRD from using it's own copies of these packages.

At one point they recommended using their own, and I never had occasion to update it. There's no reason I couldn't though.


Finally, is there a reason for having rrdtool BuildDepends on dlcompat-dev? I tried compiling without it and it builds and runs just fine.

This was a mistake, it should have only been in the 10.2-gcc3.3 version... (At least, it used to be required...)


--
Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. RangerRick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://ranger.befunk.com/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to