Martin Costabel wrote:
Have xfree86 Depend or BuildDepend (it is too late in the evening now for me to see clearly which one would be better) on a new package "xfree86-check" which does nothing than running the current Pre- and PostInstScripts from the xfree86 package. If this package is endowed with a somewhat more detailed error message, with references from or hints to FAQ#9.11, or maybe even details like "you don't have /usr/X11R6/include/Xlib.h, reinstall the X11SDK.pkg from Apple's dweveloper tools", I think we would save a lot of time and energy for a lot of people.
This sounds like a reasonable (and pretty easy) solution to me...
-- Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. Ranger Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://ranger.befunk.com/ We put a lot of thought into our defaults. We like them. If we didn't, we would have made something else be the default. So keep your cotton-pickin' hands off our defaults. Don't touch. Consider them mandatory. "Mandatory defaults" has a nice ring to it.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
