Le 19 ao�t 2004, � 5:33, TheSin a �crit :
Both look good to me, I like the second best, the only thing is that it doesn't take in consideration multi maintainers in multi trees.Maybe move maintainer to the table too, with ditto if it is the same.
It is not a bad idea anyway, since when there are problems with a given package, it's more convenient to see the maintainer's (or maintainers') details immediately (avoid to scroll down to the bottom of the page).
It could lead also to a revision of the maintainers. It can be that the maintainer in an old tree is no more active.
Mich�le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=
