On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:34:33PM +1000, Jeremy Higgs wrote: > > Alrighty. Thanks for the help, David and Dan. > > I don't think I made it clear in my original email, but what I was > attempting to also ask is if I can provide the pygtk-py23 and > pygtk-py22 variants from the same package description file, but not > allow the straight pygtk package to be installed? (i.e. pygtk-py22 and > pygtk-py23 are valid packages, but pygtk isn't *actually* an available > package)... if that makes any sense.
Sure. Just get rid of the "pygtk" package description file and that package will cease to be available:) Asserting pygtk-pyXX Conflicts/Replaces:pygtk in both pygtk-pyXX will automatically remove an existing "pygtk" pkg when a user updates to this new -pyXX. Since the old pygtk does not Conflicts/Replaces the -pyXX pkgs, it will be harder for them to go back to the "pygtk" way. Fink processes variants via a simple template system; there's no automagical generation of a "pygtk" pkg when pygtk-pyXX forms are defined, if that was your concern. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
