On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:51:45AM +0200, "D. H?hn" wrote: > Christian Schaffner wrote: > | > | The new apt could go into fink anyway, no? Are there any risks in just > | adding the new apt.info file to the unstable tree? > > As I did not have any time to look at this yet. Is this a patch against > the _latest_ upstream source? APT needs an update, Peter (pogma) was > working on it, but I do nto know how far he got.
It's against the 10.3/unstable apt package (0.5.4-37), and would work just as well in 10.2-gcc3.3 (0.5.4-26). Actually, it's only an 18-line patch; unless apt majorly reorganized their internal code, "should not be hard" (heh:) to use with other apt versions. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
