David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I thus propose to rename the GCC field, calling it GCC-ABI instead.
Sounds good to me. > There is one place in the fink code where the GCC field is tested, > but that test can easily be rewritten. Also validator. Three cheers for %obsolete_fields! Should the warning from test should suggest what *should* be used, not just "no such field, doofus"? dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
